😅 I was deep in thought, trying to figure out how to approach this… then I hit "Run Tests" just to see what would break — and everything passed!
I honestly don’t know how or why it worked, but it did.
Sometimes Codewars blesses us with happy little mysteries. 😄
Is that an issue with the kata… or do I just not understand what's going on yet?
Either way, time to dive back in and reverse-engineer what’s actually happening!

Haskell setup code shows BullDS for the bulls-eye return value when the actual value should be SingleBullDS

Is there a way to get the intended result of the random tests in C++?
I manually checked all the tests hands against my outcome and don't see any fails.

C:

• unehlpful assertion messages
• input should be const int[24]
• memory model of the returned pointer is not explained

C:

• input should be const int[16]
• unhelpful assertion messages
• the memory model for the output is not explained

Poker question no. 1:
it("Highest pair wins", function() { assert(Result.loss, "6S AD 7H 4S AS", "AH AC 5H 6H 7S");});

--> Is this an error in the test cases? (the pair is equal: both have a pair of aces)

--> Is this saying that only in case of an equal pair, the suit is relevant? (clubs beats spades)

--> Is this saying that in case of an equal pair, the highest card is deciding? (5 beats 4)

Go preloaded tests are not quite right. It doesn't correctly pick up the set variables clues and expected. I assume because the examples run after all lines of the Describe are evaluated, so the way it's done it only runs with last clues and examples. Could we move setting these variables inside the It?

var _ = Describe("Sky Scraper", func() {
  
  It("can solve 6x6 puzzle 1", func() {
    clues := []int{ 3, 2, 2, 3, 2, 1,
          1, 2, 3, 3, 2, 2,
          5, 1, 2, 2, 4, 3,
          3, 2, 1, 2, 2, 4}
          
    expected := [][]int{{ 2, 1, 4, 3, 5, 6 },
            { 1, 6, 3, 2, 4, 5 },
            { 4, 3, 6, 5, 1, 2 },
            { 6, 5, 2, 1, 3, 4 },
            { 5, 4, 1, 6, 2, 3 },
            { 3, 2, 5, 4, 6, 1 }}

      Expect(SolvePuzzle(clues)).To(Equal(expected))
  })
  
  It("can solve 6x6 puzzle 2", func() {
    clues := []int{ 0, 0, 0, 2, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 6, 3, 0, 0, 4, 0, 0, 0, 0, 4, 4, 0, 3, 0, 0}
    expected := [][]int{{ 5, 6, 1, 4, 3, 2 },  { 4, 1, 3, 2, 6, 5 }, { 2, 3, 6, 1, 5, 4 }, 
            { 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 }, { 1, 2, 5, 6, 4, 3 }, { 3, 4, 2, 5, 1, 6 }}            

    Expect(SolvePuzzle(clues)).To(Equal(expected))
  })
  
   It("can solve 6x6 puzzle 3", func() {
     clues := []int{ 0, 3, 0, 5, 3, 4, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 3, 0, 3, 2, 3, 3, 2, 0, 3, 1, 0}
     expected := [][]int{{ 5, 2, 6, 1, 4, 3 }, { 6, 4, 3, 2, 5, 1 }, { 3, 1, 5, 4, 6, 2 }, 
            { 2, 6, 1, 5, 3, 4 }, { 4, 3, 2, 6, 1, 5 }, { 1, 5, 4, 3, 2, 6 }}

     Expect(SolvePuzzle(clues)).To(Equal(expected))
   })
})

Python (probably other languages also) too: modifying input can influence the random tests: see this

[Python]

Random tests are full of cheaters, e.g.:

Failed at test 32: '7C 7S 3S 7H 5S' against '7C 7S KH 2H 7H': 'Tie' should equal 'Loss'

There can't be two "three of a kind" with the same cards.

My solution passed, but does not work properly:
my hand "7C 7S 2S 2H AH" wins against "KC KH 5D QS QC".

A test is missing for this case I guess.

This kata is a candidate for retirement as broken: https://github.com/codewars/content-issues/issues/205

Please share your opinion how to handle this broken kata: retire? fix? Something else?

I solved it using python and 7 basic tests pass without a problem, but at "Random coordinates" attempt I get a message "None should equal '11'". Could someone help me understand why this is happening?