oh super() makes a lot more sense than what i was doing lol

Great kata to exercise with, amazing.

Nice series, pretty tricky coming up with an elegant solution.

You're very welcome, best of luck.

That is not an issue.

Nice!

Thanks!!!

😅 I was deep in thought, trying to figure out how to approach this… then I hit "Run Tests" just to see what would break — and everything passed!
I honestly don’t know how or why it worked, but it did.
Sometimes Codewars blesses us with happy little mysteries. 😄
Is that an issue with the kata… or do I just not understand what's going on yet?
Either way, time to dive back in and reverse-engineer what’s actually happening!

thx man

No, JavaScript's interpreter understands both cases with the same way, it's a little bit styled.

is there a reason to put it in bracets?

Hi,

1. spoiler flag, please
2. you don't need the first approach here, if you programmed the other one correctly

Negative Zero Kata

I found quite a few, you arrogant dutch-man:

• The example shows the quota as a ceiled integer, is that for display purposes or hidden spec that we need to ceil total votes over total seats?
• You don't explain which method of "highest average of votes per seat" to use. Only in the wiki page there is a reference to the method used in Dutch elections. I'm not even sure you use that one.
• You don't explain whether continious updates of seats should be used in assigning residual votes, or a snapshot should be taken a priori, both in first phase, as in recalculation of seats in coalitions.