For correctness. Avoids altering the numbers argument which could impact tests

But it isn't how it looks, it's about time complexity. This function fail.

given an array of minimum 4 positive integers. No floats or non-positive integers will be passed.

this functions fails if the numbers array contains strings, null, undefined, or other non-numeric values

first time mine looks better than top one XD!

low amount of lines but time complexity higher than mine :P

The drunk friend from this instructions is definitely a bit crazy guy 😂 it's unbelievable to make such substitution immediately in the head

Enabled in this fork

Kata retired.

the sorting approach is too much extra work.

good

Nice

Ok sooo for task with Large array what is the type of Sort you advises ?

The sorting approach is generally less efficient for this specific task, especially when dealing with large arrays, due to the higher time complexity of the sorting algorithm. The looping approach focuses on finding only the two smallest numbers, resulting in better performance for this particular requirement.

how dose the code runs? your code gives me sort is not a function 😕