Done.

Should I mark this issue as resolved?

How do I include it? Commented solution at the bottom of test cases file?

I DMed the solutions on Discord. My username is pythonist1159 there.

Please add four new test cases in Sample tests and Fixed/Basic tests of OCaml translation.

let trueCount = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
    const [x1, y1, x2, y2, cmds, expected] = generateTestCase(randInt(1000));
    if (expected === true) trueCount += 1;
}

console.log("JS true count", trueCount);

Output:

JS true count 58
JS true count 49
JS true count 54
JS true count 58

true_count = 0
for _ in range(100):
    x1, y1, x2, y2, cmds, expected = generate_testcase(random.randint(0, 1000))
    true_count += int(expected)

print("Expected True Count:", true_count)

Output:

Expected True Count: 53
Expected True Count: 58
Expected True Count: 55
Expected True Count: 62

To be more precise, It is around 55/45 for JS and Python.

If you want me to set specs back to 500, I will do it.

Coming to random spray, it is generating around 50/50 true/false, at least for Python and JS.

The system is not letting me approve your translation due to merge conflict in Problem statement. BTW I have made some changes in test cases and problem statement, I encourage you to update Scala and OCaml translations accordingly.

1. Change in Constraints

0 <= x1, y1, x2, y2 <= 1000
0 <= len(commands) <= 1000

2. Four new test cases added in Sample Tests and Fixed Tests.
3. Random test cases are now of random lengths. The len(commands) for each test case is calculated randomly.

I updated the test cases according to your suggestios. I encourage you to update Haskell translation accordingly.

1. Change in Constraints Constraints set back to 500 but includes 0.

0 <= x1, y1, x2, y2 <= 500
0 <= len(commands) <= 500

2. Four new test cases added in Sample Tests and Fixed Tests.
3. Random test cases are now of random lengths. The len(commands) for each test case is calculated randomly.

Approved

Yeah, you are right. Before writing this kata, I seached for duplicate but thinking that kata is easy, I only searched 7kyu and 8kyu. But the duplicate kata was in 6kyu. I generated title, problem statement using chatgpt. Even the title is also same.

Yeah, you are right. Before writing this kata, I seached for duplicate but thinking that kata is easy, I only searched 7kyu and 8kyu. But the duplicate kata was in 6kyu. I generated title, problem statement using chatgpt. Even the title is also same.