Ad
  • Custom User Avatar

    This appears to be fixed.

  • Custom User Avatar

    And I just solved this kata in Java - found out that it doesn't support Java only when I tried to submit my solution. Well, I've learnt my lesson - always check supported languages before starting work on a kata.

  • Custom User Avatar

    Ouch! Thanks for pointing that out. I've corrected that test and reduced the threshold to the correct value of 2 (as per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandelbrot_set).

  • Custom User Avatar

    Thank you very much, Pablo, for doing this job. Translations are good! :)

  • Custom User Avatar

    Edit: Now it covers. Should return the lowest missing number.

  • Custom User Avatar

    This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

  • Custom User Avatar

    Fixed. Thanks!

  • Custom User Avatar

    Thanks Pablo, that's a really great feedback.

    The reason why I did not include a link to the wikipedia page, is because the actual page is very dry, and not really informative.

    I think it would be worth updating the wikipedia page before providing the link, that is something I might do once I have more spare time.

    For now if you know any good resourses on the topic, please let me know and I'll include them.

    Thanks againg for the awesome feedback.

  • Custom User Avatar

    This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

  • Custom User Avatar

    Fixed.
    Thanks for the feedback!

  • Custom User Avatar

    Well, it says in the problem description that the test strings will only contain those symbols. Actually, when I first started writing this, I considered that, but I thought it would just be a needless addition that distracts from the actual problem - a quick two line for loop or one line regex removes that element altogether, so I thought it didn't really add anything to the problem.