fixed

Neither tests nor example solution use numpy, but balance on the random tests is not great. I just modforked the python version and while majority of runs completes below 2 seconds, it's not ucommon to get some tests to take 5 to 9 seconds to occassional timeout.

But still, majority of runs completes in a short time, so I'd guess you have still something to improve.

Can't get anywhere. I hope we don't need some numpy tweeks to pass this one in Python.

Sorry for offtop, but what software you used to generate this image? I was looking for something like that for a while

How does your algorithm fare on this test case?

1. Wash: carrots for 10 minutes
2. Wash: rice for 5 minutes
3. Boil: rice (takes 10 minutes)
4. Boil: carrots (takes 2 minutes)
5. Add: carrots for 20 minutes

Thanks, should be fixed now. I also added a fixed case similar to this to the tests.

Ahh, that's on me. There was an error in comparing polygons that was corrected in the sample tests but not the main ones. Should be fixed now.

.

They're there now, thanks a lot :)

Thanks, it should be fixed now. I believe it came up because the original challenge was to return the element of the sequence 1/1 2/1 1/2 3/1 ..., but I decided to swap the order so this happened. Honestly, just had to change a <= to <.

Do you think I should test for this? It seems like a very specific problem that comes up with a very specific solution.

thx

Perhaps you should generate more variation in random tests. I would try to include patterns from each of the fixed test batches.

Did you prohibit some modules in Python?

Thank you for translation.

added