C++

This is strange. With naive solution I couldn't pass test on big numbers due to time out. Then completed successfully with memorizing. And when looked at others solutions was quite surprised - they completed with the same naive algorithm.

Have there been any updates to the tests?

omg XD i just make it long

I want to use it but i forgot its name and used methods ;(

JS done in this fork closing!

I'm confused. It's just copypaste task, I literally solved nothing in this kata. =/

Random tests in Haskell generate inputs inefficiently and the failure messages don't properly show the function arguments.

I've made a Haskell fork that fixes both of these issues.

The reference solution in Haskell also had some inefficiencies which might have slowed down testing even more. I've made a Haskell fork that improves the reference solution as well as removed the performance requirements.

+++

good

Done in this fork

I solved this kata. My solution passed all the tests. But I didn't feel satisfied. Something haunted me. Suddenly I understand a problem! In my first solution I wrote condition: else: min_red == min_black
return "No points scored".Do not take into account the rest of the throws,can give a wrong result. I have got a shok! I write another solution.I want to draw the attention of the author at this moment and so that he will revise the tests.But I really liked the kata!

Done for Ruby, in this fork

Done in this fork

that's a good way to do it, thanks i learned something!