merged, thanks!

thank you for your kind words!

Hi,
Please don’t "Couper les cheveux en quatre" on this challenge! There may be similar ones out there, but none are exact duplicates. We all can be a bit ‘blind to the basics’ sometimes, so it’s good to revisit them. Even if you solved something similar a couple of years ago, I’m sure a lot of people will still find this one interesting.

Cheers!

6 kyu I think :)

what is the way then? Detect or forbid global usage?

fixed

sorry, indeed looks that it is ambiguous :/ Putting kata in draft and on the fresh head will polish tests. Good night :)

thank you very much - kata came out of the beta!

thank you for your kind words - such feedback helps to continue creating new! ^^

changed, unfortunately still not enough. :( Wrote to Ulrich asking him to provide a feedback because I am almost sure that he can help with it.

hi! can you please provide a ranking feedback for this kata? I think that only 1 vote is not enough to make it approvable. let's help this baby to be born :)

good kata, unfortunately, my vote and rank is still not enough to make it approvable :/

I am checking correct ordering in the tests. I think that ordering in the output here indeed is not the focus of the logic being tested, but rather a way to validate correctness in assertions. If a query logically guarantees correct representation without explicit ordering, I believe it should be accepted.

BTW, brilliant solution, Twilight_Sun :) Like in Ukraine we are joking, "solution of the son of his mother's friend" :D

Zich weren als een duivel in een wijwatervat. But I am back :) Happy New Year!

What if more than one person with the same name visits the same number of couuntries? :) I think that to cover all possible cases there should be 3 ordering criterions

"We always have to see both categories in the results, even if one or both of the counts is zero."