Please, add like those tests, it's really gonna start my head/
Test(Real_Addition, should_pass_all_the_tests_provided) {
tester( 100, 100, 200);
tester( 10000, 10000, 20000);

}

Test(Silly_Addition, should_pass_all_the_tests_provided) {
tester( 1240, 1900, 21140);
tester( 30003, 99000, 129003);
}

Thank you all for fast answers!!!

Oops. I'm not sure how I missed it :p

• added std::setprecision() to the custom stringizer
• fixed the rounding in the reference solution (it was incorrectly adding 0.5 to the value to be rounded)

I added std::setprecision() to the stringizer. the issue about rounding + strict equality instead of approximate equality still remains, but it's already been raised below

done

@trashy_incel Can you remove the image and use KaTeX for math formulas in the meantime ? ^^

done

fixed

duplicate of this issue

root of the issue: unlike other languages, C compares the expected and actual values with approximate equality post-rounding, not strict equality post-rounding. and the epsilon used to compare and print the numbers is 1e-5, while the description asks for rounding to 1e-4. also, there is a bug in the random tests that make them generate the same coordinates for every test.

here is a fork that fixes all that, also improves the description and makes it language-agnostic + Markdown instead of HTML

The user appears to have solved the kata, there don't appear to be any issues with the tests in Java.

I'm assuming he's talking about C, seeing as that's the language he solved it in.