Ad
  • Custom User Avatar

    Oh dear... has been quite a few years since I wrote this. Trying to remember what I was thinking...

    normally:

    When a train arrives at a station it stops there for a period of time determined by the length of the train!

    So the NOTES part is intended to say this "stoppage-time" rule does not apply when the "start position" by chance happens to be at a station. In that rare case, on the next/first move you will immediately depart the station. So is the description really misleading? At the very beginning the "next move" and the "first move" is the same thing.

    I saw something in the discourse that someone changed and I reverted 6yrs ago. But I can't see the history to see the actual changes to the wording.

  • Custom User Avatar

    First of all, love the Yoshi drawing. Now, what tests exactly do you want in the description? I already have the sizes in the description, do you want the number of tests?

    Pretty much all I could say about the random tests are in the final tests and you can just hit submit with an empty solution to see all information.

  • Custom User Avatar

    Thanks

  • Custom User Avatar
  • Custom User Avatar

    description was updated

  • Custom User Avatar
  • Custom User Avatar

    Thanks!

    1. I have fixed the missing suits for the example

    2. This is mentioned in the problem description. I have added the fixed tests for this example (there was one actually - that tested full deck of cards in two different orders, but I added some better examples to the flop section.

  • Custom User Avatar

    ready

  • Custom User Avatar

    Edited and Updated. Looks good?

  • Custom User Avatar

    Ah! I see. Im a bit slow today. facepalm myself.

  • Custom User Avatar

    All they mean is that when you wrote the description, you said that if there are no absentees, we should use the phrase "No absent digits". But when you wrote the actual tests and your solution, you used the phrase "All digits present", which doesnt match.

    So either you should update the description to tell solvers to use "All digits present", or you should change your solution and all the tests to expect the phrase "No abset digits". I think changing the description is much easier.

  • Custom User Avatar

    Please give me an example. Sounds like my code might be faulty.

  • Custom User Avatar

    the description doesn't match the expected outcome

  • Custom User Avatar

    Tests only require one or more digits to be present. If all digits are present then none are absent and bottom of winners list should state "No absent digits". But if there are absent digits the bottom of the winners list should instead list those missing digits. Absent digits are digits zero through nine that are not included in the input string. Please excuse me, I didnt sleep well so im a little foogy. Hope Im understanding you correctly.

  • Custom User Avatar

    Oh sorry, it's my first time creating a task like this.
    Is there a way to differ between my code and submitted code to check if it matches?

  • Loading more items...