🥰😍😘😘😘🥰🥰

Raised as issue in discourse.

I am not sure how the other translations handle this, but the input format seems fundamentally flawed. With inputs as dicts, any node can lead to at most one other node, despite the description and even sample tests trying to give the impression that multiple paths could exist.

For example this is tested in the sample tests: {'a':'b', 'b':'c', 'c':'a', 'c':'d', 'e':'a'}, however of course when this is parsed it resolves to just {'a': 'b', 'b': 'c', 'c': 'd', 'e': 'a'}, the 'c':'a' is lost.

Edit: It looks like other translations use adjacency lists. Accordingly, the python translation should use a list of tuples instead of a dict.

Fork from here if you wish to continue working on it.

Approved in new fork. You, as original translation author, are eligible for full rnk/hnr points.

updated to 3.11 and approved

Magic

i did the same thing but created a variable for a+b then bin()[2:] that

first solution that came to mind

This really good

yeah well i assumed using bin was cheating.

You’re right. Thank you for the remark.