....
....
....
...X
....
....
....
....
....
....
Expected: equal to "[3, 7]"
Actual: "[3, 6]"

If 0,0 is bottom left corner then this test case is wrong..

JS fork resolving this issue

js fork (helped by katafix)

• uses mocha/chai assertions
• uses lodash for randomness
• adds random tests
• provides inputs on failure

Return true if you have enough mana to cast the spell

But you may need to cast many spells, so this is misleading. The description should mention that all the spells need to be casted.

• Description should be language-agnostic

• Should also display an example for Henry

• No sample tests in JS

• Node 18. (mocha + chai) should be enabled

CS test setup is flawed

The description should be language agnostic

JS:

• No random tests

• mocha + chai should be used

CS:

• No random tests

• mocha + chai should be used

Python: Random tests are vulnerable to input modification

Not every vocabulary word is tested in JS --> solution as proof

please add this example to explain this line 'The glass representation may be larger or smaller. If a liquid doesn't fill a row, it floats to the top and to the left.'

{ {
{ 'H', 'H', 'W', 'O' }, { 'O','O','O','W' },
{ 'W', 'W', 'W', 'W' }, => { 'W','W','W','W' },
{ 'H', 'H', 'O', 'O' } { 'H','H','H','H' }
} }

it can be understood as

{ {
{ 'H', 'H', 'W', 'O' }, { 'O','O','O', '' },
{ 'W', '', '', '' },
{ 'W', 'W', 'W', 'W' }, => { 'W','W','W','W' },
{ 'H', 'H', 'O', 'O' } { 'H','H','H','H' }
} }

or

{ {
{ 'H', 'H', 'W', 'O' }, { 'W','O','O','O' },
{ 'W', 'W', 'W', 'W' }, => { 'W','W','W','W' },
{ 'H', 'H', 'O', 'O' } { 'H','H','H','H' }
} }

Why too many format codes should throw an error but %f without a number should print %f?

Java translation