Haskell translation

fixed

C translation test code swaps x and y coordinates from regular (x,y) order when printing

It seems that in C translation, max & min are swapped in the test output:

Submitted: {0.0, 162.0}
Expected:  {1.0, 162.0}

made a hotfix cuz the fork actually had min and max values swapped (you had min then max in the struct, which the description had the other order)

sorry about that :(

approved, had to fork your translation since the description was outdated with the 'Descirption' issue though

1. If not stated, the area by definition is always the positive value, and the sides are undirected, so it's not required to specifically note about absolute area. (Otherwise yeah, the area might be negative in some circumstances, but that's an overkill imho)

2. Probably that was because of some shenanigans with assertions; rn both 3.10 and 3.11 correctly evaluate either float or int values, so it doesn't really matter to specify that either.

Hope I've answered your suggestions, closing this now

Very interesting kata, good job.

C Translation (author inactive).

Cool kata, just 2 small suggestions for clarity:

1. State that you are looking for the largest/smallest absolute area i.e. unsigned area; so a triangle with a signed area of -25 has an absolute area of 25. Otherwise, mathematically speaking, the "smallest" area triangle will always be the negative value of the largest area triangle.

2. (Python 3.10) - It is stated that "Areas should be rounded to tenths." but when I returned (25.0, 5.0) I got error message expecting int values i.e. (25,5) - imho it would be better to be consistent in the return types?

fixed by someone

? where are you seeing this?

java or python?

But it obviously doesn't?... Anyways, whatever

When the order of selected points matters, there are 5 * 4 * 3 = 60 ways to choose.

Make your program efficient. With 5 points, you can make 60 triangles, but only 10 of them will be different.

This is a weird statement. According to combinatorics, there should be C(5, 3) = 5! / (3! * 2!) = 5 * 4 / 2 = 10 triangles. I don't understand where the number 60 comes from.