Thank you for your feedback! I fixed the description.

when the author is your uncle.

I really enjoyed this kata. I do however have a couple of suggestions to improve your kata's description. In the Input section of the kata's description, you currently state "Jump back to the matching command #7 if the cell under the pointer is 1" for the "]" command. It should however state "Jump back to the matching command #7 if the cell under the pointer is non-zero". I also suggest that you explicitly state how your kata expects EOF conditions to to be handled for the "CAT" programs.

Python:for n = 7,
sequence = [53, 29, 87, 99, 7, 7, 24, 9, (67, 84, 38, 86, 87, 12, 0), =87=, 28, 16, (55, 13, 86, 57, 34, 31, 89), =55=, 85, 75, 52, 93, 96, 44, 59, 56, 5, 32, 17, 22, (79, 30, 84, 52, 64, 53, 94), =30=, 85, 0, 3, 81, 98, 23, 49, 87, 48]
test says 3 should equal 1
but we have 3 matches:
[67, 84, 38, 86, 87, 12, 0] 87
[55, 13, 86, 57, 34, 31, 89] 55
[79, 30, 84, 52, 64, 53, 94] 30
What I am doing wrong ?

fixed

JavaScript uses the deprecated Test framework

the only no-itertools solution )

Easy task, terrible instructions.

Remember: this is Codewars. Here, readability goes out the window.

let's save our computing cycles :)

How does adding 0.01 improve rounding here? thanks.

This might be a very simple function, but it's basically unreadable. Makes maintaining a codebase a lot harder. Same function just with more descriptive variable names and a comment or two and you should be set.

Shorter does not always equal better.

Hint: dont waste your time on it