I think it is not. In that kata, the input is two strings, thus finding and considering the midpoint, and the string length being an even number, are not relevant. Also the correspondence is two-way in this kata and one-way over there: the first string may contain any number of extra characters or any other characters not appearing in the second without changing the result.

I don't know, so I looked, and https://github.com/Codewars/content-issues/wiki/List-of-Possible-Duplicate-Kata says,

Note that "duplicate" is not defined yet.

With such quick and easy requirements, my guess is that this has a high probability of having already been formulated. So it is probably a duplicate of something, but not that.

Is it? What are the qualifications for two katas to be different?

Forked & Approved.

• Moved assertion inside it block
• Flipped actual and expected values in the assertion

Sample test & Actual fixed tests: Please move all the assertions inside the it block [Ref]

Example:

@test.describe('Example Tests')
def example_tests():
    @test.it("Should reverse a sequence")
    def _():
        seq = [1,2,3,4,5]
        reverse(seq)
        test.assert_equals([5,4,3,2,1], seq)
        
        ...

Really appreciate that.

what kind of greeting is this

Python fork: minor description changes

https://www.codewars.com/kumite/6693554e4a917aa88036db35

Pretty nice kata, got a kick of difficulty to it

Also, hello fellow rice farmer!

Way too easy, but hey, free score is free score

I came back to this kata after 4 years

Amazing

Description should be more specific on the expected output?

Like should be there any rounding or what?

Challenging but fun and also surprisingly simple

https://www.codewars.com/kumite/665c22668c1787eb68874920

New fork

The43rdDev - I have used a majority of your description and going to reject this fork. Please do some minor change in new fork, as it is fair that you will be recorded as contributor if this kata gets approved.