Hi, yes of course.

• First of all, the solution has already been given, you don’t need to come up with your own, you just need to fix the bug.
• Next, we don't know what kind of string we'll get and whether the string will contain spaces.

Taking into account the above, I have chosen this solution.
You can check and see for yourself or read this link:
Number.isNaN(' ') ---> false
Number.isNaN(parseInt(' ')) ---> true

P.s. Also, I try to apply the solutions as if it were in a real project or interview.
If you have a different opinion, please write it to me.

Hi , can you describe to me why u use this way to answer ?

The optimal solution I was looking for before I just brute forced it. Well done.

Hi and thank you very much! )

Hi, I find this is the best by far because of it's clarity and avoids using any

Thank you for your answer.
Yes, it was my fault.
I need to be attentive to details.

It's expected your answer to equal expected answer, so the expected value in the error message is 1 not -1. -1 is the value your function returned. Not a kata issue.

[[1,1,1],[0,2,2],[0,0,0]]: expected -1 to equal 1.

The test expects -1, although the correct answer is 1.

Yes, you're right, I don't know why I did it)

hey friend you already passed the key up in the EggList copmponent there is no need to pass it again down in the EasterEgg

Yes, I agree with you. And your solution is very accurate

If this solution is correct it means tests are weak.

C Translation (author inactive).

Amazing Kata!

WTF?? ))