python never ceases to amaze me in its simplicity

invalid solution, fails for negative numbers.

example input: find_longest([1, -20, 100]) # should be 100

the purpose of this website is education, not passing the provided test cases with the least amount of code. this is the problem with "gamified" learning.

Not readable.

who cares it satisfies the Sensei

mildly infuriating

Interesting twist. I went along the same idea but with a diferent else treatment.

have you worked a lot in c?

Sorry for adding my three peas, but
it doesn't work for negativ numbers in the array, i.e [-1, 10] should return 10, not -1, right?
And what about with empty lists? ;)

You don't need to say that.

fantastic

Brilliant.

I see thanks, I think this is a Python 3 guarantee only though? The docs from Python 2 are different https://docs.python.org/2/library/functions.html#max and see SO https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6783000/which-maximum-does-python-pick-in-the-case-of-a-tie